Robin Powell

 

 

 

 

 

An experienced television journalist, Robin runs Regis Media, a UK-based content marketing consultancy which helps financial advice firms around the world to attract, retain and educate clients.

  • Grey Twitter Icon
  • Grey Facebook Icon
  • Grey Google+ Icon
  • Grey YouTube Icon
Adviser 2.0 powered by REGIS MEDIA
Have a regular newsletter delivered straight to your inbox
Strategic partner
Sparrows_Capital_Logotype_CMYK.png
Recent posts
Related posts
Archive

Big changes ahead in adviser charging — report




By KATIE EARL



We can expect huge changes to the way that UK financial advice and planning firms charge for advice and for asset management, a new study claims.


The report by the Edinburgh-based consultancy The Lang Cat is entitled Serenity, Courage, Wisdom – disruption and innovation in retail investment pricing, referring to the multi-faceted approach it has taken to the findings of recent research. It examines four key areas of the industry to conclude that drastic price reductions in the next five years are not just possible, but inevitable.


Change, disruption, and innovation: which is which?


The report makes a careful distinction between the terms change, disruption and innovation. The nuances of these terms, it explains, are important to clarify. “For an industry which has seen so much change in the last decade, everything remains remarkably similar” the authors assert, “So what gives?” Their answer: “we haven’t experienced disruption at all. We’re not using the right words”.


And herein lie the foundations of the report’s findings. There are parts of the industry that require disrupting or innovating. Others, though, either don’t need changing, or simply cannot be changed with certainty of benefit or with ease.


It’s up to advisers to learn the difference, and to accept these truths.



The changes to expect


The crux of the report focuses on how fees could be reduced across the industry.

In total, 13 innovations or disruptions are suggested, each given a score for their impact, doability [sic], and likelihood. These included:

  • Tiering, capping and collaring, or smarter versions thereof, for advisory firms

  • Capped fees and modular pricing of platforms

  • Discretionary fund manager fees tiered with a cap

  • Performance fees for fund managers

The scores for each suggestion varied significantly, but the common denominator was an emphasis on serving clients across the board.



Accepting the things we cannot change


The authors, though, found certain caveats that cannot, or should not, be cut down.

  • Advisors are the most expensive link in the retail investment chain. However, their proximity to the client and subsequent ability to drive client-focused innovation defends that position.

  • Percentage-based charging is currently the favoured method by a clear mile. While not perfect, this does allow for lower net worth clients to invest alongside those of higher net worth. To move to a fixed pricing model would disrupt this for all the wrong reasons.

  • The importance of regulation will increase with the implementation of some innovations. This is because they will require advisory firms to venture into new, uncharted territory. Therefore, innovation and disruption must be done with care and must be well planned and resourced.

  • The market must remain diverse if it is to serve clients deeply and sustainably. Innovation must balance what is good for clients with incentives to entering the market. Therefore, fees cannot be pushed down beyond a certain point or risk diminishing the diversity of the market.

  • Within five years’ time, the report predicts ongoing charges of 1% for core/satellite portfolios, including advice and custody.


Sponsors of the report


The editorial of the report was, as always, driven solely by the Lang Cat. Three sponsors funded the project, selected because of the steps they have taken to innovate pricing within their own space.


Sparrows Capital, a specialist evidence-based asset manager, caps pricing for the end client at £20 per month regardless of portfolio size. They commented “Charging asset-based fees for model portfolios is unfair on clients and ultimately unjustifiable. Clear and predictable pricing enables advisers to deliver better outcomes while addressing regulatory concerns over the provision of value.”


Multrees offers modular platform pricing, taking a stand against the one-size-fits-all approach offered by many traditional platform providers.


Orbis write of the view that their investors are partners, and explain that their fees are based on outperformance: “fees charged in good times are also subject to a refund mechanism during bad times.”.

The bigger picture


Serenity, Courage, Wisdom is just the most recent of three publications by the Lang Cat this year. For further reading to cement your understanding, you can read their reports on due diligence and centralised investment propositions here.



Enjoyed this article? We think you’ll like these too:


UK consumers face advice gap


Digital advice trend accelerates


A letter to my successor


Is retirement planning dead?


Do you know what you are worth?




Adviser 2.0 is part of Regis Media's mission to improve standards of service and professionalism in financial advice. If you've written an article that you would like to be considered as a guest post, please email it to our editor Robin Powell.

To find out more about Regis Media and the work we do advice firms around the world, why not visit our website and YouTube channel?


Picture: William Iven via Unsplash



© Adviser 2.0 MMXX





ADVISER 2.0, FINANCIAL ADVICE REINVENTED, POWERED BY REGIS MEDIA

  • Grey Facebook Icon
  • Grey Twitter Icon

Adviser 2.0 is produced by Regis Media, a specialist provider of content marketing for evidence-based advisers. 

Contact Regis Media

DISCLAIMER: All content is for informational purposes only. We make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, suitability or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions or any damages arising from its display or use. Full disclaimer.